24/7 Rapid Response · Gate, boom or fence down? Call 0400 101 132
Access · Automation · Managed securityMelbourne-based · Australia-wideCompliance-led site delivery24/7 emergency: 0400 101 132
Illustrative imageBackground image: RJL commercial gate and perimeter security project in Victoria

Technical project case study

Hawk Logistics: Remote Gatehouse & Driver Check-In Development

RJL Commercial Group has developed the RJL Multicom SG-PRO™ foundation-phase demonstration for Hawk Logistics’ refrigerated transport yard in Truganina, Melbourne. The workflow connects a driver check-in interface with an operator console intended for an offshore team in Manila. The demonstration establishes the interaction design and proposed integration scope, rather than a completed, commissioned remote gatehouse installation.

Project scope and evidence status

Foundation-phase development case study — the source demonstrates workflows; live hardware, network failover and field commissioning are not established by the demo.

Driver check-in and operator review

The demonstration collects direction, registration, driver and company details, job references and refrigerated-load information. It shows how an operator can review the incoming answers alongside a gatehouse checklist. Local browser storage and message channels synchronise the demonstration; they are not presented as secure production persistence, authentication or a cross-country data service.

Proposed boom-gate and detection scope

The project documentation identifies Roger Technology Bionik BI/006 boom gates, a B73/LTM traffic-light module and Roger DLD vehicle-loop detection as the intended hardware scope. Real detector inputs, command interfaces and physical limit feedback require field design, installation and commissioning. Brand and model selection alone do not establish compliance of the entrance.

Camera and intercom design

The documented camera scope includes Hikvision DS-2CD6984G1-IHS(U)Y(/NFC) 32 MP panoramic cameras. Camera positioning, plate capture and visibility of trailer temperature displays must be assessed and tested in the actual yard. The manufacturer’s AES product range is named Opyn; the final intercom model and operator communications path must be confirmed for deployment. Demo camera and intercom indicators are not evidence of live video, audio or NVR-health integration.

Keep remote authorisation separate from movement safety

The proposed remote command scope is an open request. Hardwired protective devices and the commissioned local controller remain responsible for movement and the safe closing behaviour of the barrier. Suspending remote requests during a fault does not prove that the physical barrier is closed, or that every emergency and egress condition is safe. The installed system needs its own risk assessment and operating procedures.

Secure transport and resilience are deployment work

The architecture proposes authenticated commands, integrity checks, an encrypted network path and cellular failover. HMAC protects authenticity and integrity; it does not encrypt traffic. VPN, messaging, credentials, network outages and reconnection behaviour must be implemented and tested before operational use. The foundation demo’s simulated failover indicator is not an uptime guarantee.

Field validation before operational handover

The next phase must confirm vehicle detection, independent barrier-position feedback, camera and intercom performance, command authorisation, safe fault behaviour and locally approved manual procedures. Driver workflows and operator decisions must be tested with representative yard traffic. RJL can then agree the maintenance and reporting scope for the commissioned assets.

Related services and project evidence

Sources and further reading

Technical and operational FAQs

Does the Hawk foundation demo operate the real boom gates?

No. The inspected project documentation identifies the interface as a demonstration. Live gate control, safety inputs, video, intercom, secure identity and network failover require separate implementation and commissioning.

Does suspending remote open requests mean the physical barrier fails closed?

No. Remote request suspension does not establish physical position. Barrier movement, protective functions and emergency or manual behaviour depend on the commissioned on-site system.

Plan the next step with RJL.

Discuss your site, access requirements or maintenance portfolio with our Thomastown team.

Free maintenance report